GCSE Maths Higher · AQA · Index laws and standard form
Rewrite the base as a prime power first
When students see , the instinct is to add the indices and write . That answer is wrong because the product rule only applies when the bases are identical. The fix: rewrite first, then .
A paired error appears in standard-form calculations: students raise only the power of ten to the bracket power and leave the coefficient untouched. So they write instead of the correct . Both errors share the same root cause: a step is skipped before an index law is applied.
Ready to fix this? The Index laws & standard form lesson works through this misconception and the others in Index laws & standard form, one altitude at a time.
How to spot it in your own work
- You wrote , adding indices across two different bases without rewriting first.
- You wrote , applying the power only to the and leaving 2.5 unchanged.
- You left as without rewriting to express the answer as a power of 7.
- You wrote , forgetting to include the index from rewriting .
An exam question that triggers it
Here is the structure of a typical AQA Higher index-laws question:
(a) Write as a single power of 2.
(b) Evaluate , giving your answer in standard form.
For (a): the misconception gives or some other wrong answer. The fix: rewrite , then .
For (b): the misconception gives . The fix: raise both factors to : .
Why students fall for this
The product rule is so well-drilled that students apply it to any product of powers, regardless of whether the bases match. The bases and feel related (one is a multiple of the other), so the check “are these actually the same base?” is skipped.
The standard-form error follows the same pattern. Students have practised applying powers to and correctly compute , but they treat the coefficient 2.5 as a label rather than a factor. The bracket signals that the exponent governs everything inside, not just the power-of-ten term.
A third pattern is composite bases in power-of-a-power questions. Students who see apply the rule immediately to get and stop there, not recognising that the question asks for a power of 7 and that rewriting is the required first step.
The fix: Rewrite to a common prime base first, then apply the index law
Step 1: check whether the bases are identical. If yes, apply the index law directly. If no, rewrite each base as a power of the common prime before proceeding.
Step 2: rewrite composite bases. , , , . Write each factor as a power of the smallest prime factor, then proceed.
Step 3: for a bracket power, raise every factor. . For this means computing as well as .
Step 4: renormalise if needed. After applying the power to the coefficient, check that the result is in the range . Here , so adjust the exponent accordingly.
Worked example
Simplify as a single power of 2.
- Rewrite. , so
- Add indices. Check: , and . Confirmed.
Evaluate in standard form.
- Raise both factors to -3.
- Compute each part. . , so .
- Renormalise. Trap: leaves 2.5 untouched.
Simplify as a power of 7.
- Rewrite. , so .
- Apply the outer power. Check : .
Find out if this is costing you marks
The 10-minute diagnostic checks for this pattern (and four others) using AQA-style GCSE Higher items. Free, no signup, anonymous.
Common questions
- Why is not equal to ?
The product rule only applies when the bases are identical. 8 and 2 are different bases. Rewrite first: . The trap is wrong.
- Why is equal to and not ?
A bracket power applies to every factor inside the bracket. . Since and , the result is . The trap leaves 2.5 unchanged, which misses the step of raising the coefficient to the power.
- How do you simplify as a power of 7?
Rewrite . So . Then . Check for : .
Related misconceptions
- Negative indices mean reciprocals, not negative numbersReading the minus in 8^-5 as a sign on the result instead of recognising a^-n = 1/a^n, the companion misconception in the same Higher index-laws vertical.
- Fractional indices mean roots, not divisionReading 9^(1/2) as 9 divided by 2 = 4.5 rather than the square root 3, the second misconception in the Higher index-laws vertical.