GCSE Maths Higher · AQA · Index laws and standard form
Negative indices mean reciprocals, not negative numbers
When students see , the instinct is to read the minus in the index as a sign on the result and write . That answer is wrong in sign and wrong in magnitude. The correct rule is : a negative index means one over, not a sign change.
So , a tiny positive fraction. The trap answer is a large negative integer. These differ in sign and in magnitude by a factor of . This confusion is one of the most reliable grade 7 to 9 mark-losers on AQA Higher index-law papers.
Already know this is your gap? Skip the diagnostic and jump straight into the targeted lesson.
How to spot it in your own work
- You wrote (or any negative number) as the value of , reading the minus in the index as a sign on the result.
- You circled , , or as the reciprocal of instead of .
- Given , you wrote instead of .
- You confused a negative index (, positive result) with a negative base to an odd power (, negative result).
An exam question that triggers it
Here is the structure of a typical AQA Higher index-laws question:
Circle the expression that is equal to the reciprocal of .
The misconception circles (sign change) or (base-index swap). The fix: the reciprocal of is . Keep the base 8 and negate only the index.
Why students fall for this
Students see a minus sign and associate it with “negative number.” The minus in is in the index, but the brain registers the sign first and attaches it to the result: the expression becomes in the student’s mental model.
A second error pattern is the base-index swap: the student sees the 5 in the index of and the 8 in the base and produces or as the “reciprocal,” conflating reciprocal with some kind of reversal operation on the digits.
Both errors are reinforced by the fact that the wrong answers look plausible: they use the same digits as the correct expression. A student who writes or often has no sense that anything is wrong, which is what makes this a reliable mark-loser at grades 7 to 9.
The fix: Negative index means one over: a^-n = 1/a^n
Step 1: identify where the minus sign sits. If the minus is in the index (as in ), proceed to step 2. If the minus is on the base (as in ), that is a different structure: a negative base to an odd power is negative.
Step 2: write one over. Apply . Place the base and its positive index in the denominator. The numerator is 1. The result is a positive fraction.
Step 3: do not swap base and index. The reciprocal of is . The base stays as 8. The index becomes . Writing swaps the digits and is a different expression entirely.
Step 4: sense-check the sign. For a positive base, is always positive and less than 1 when . If your answer is negative, recheck whether you misread the index minus as a result minus.
Worked example
Evaluate as a fraction.
- Rule. , so Trap: , which is large and negative. These differ by a factor of .
Circle the reciprocal of from the list , , , .
- Reciprocal = one over. . Keep the base 8, negate the index.
- Reject the traps. is a sign change, not a reciprocal. and swap the base and index. Only equals . ✓
Symbolic: given , find .
- Apply the rule. .
- Substitute. Since : Trap: , which confuses the negative index with a sign change on the value .
Find out if this is costing you marks
The 10-minute diagnostic checks for this pattern (and four others) using AQA-style GCSE Higher items. Free, no signup, anonymous.
Common questions
- Why does equal a positive number and not minus ?
Because the minus sign is in the index, not in front of the base. The rule says: negative index means one over. So , which is positive. The expression is a sign change on the result, a completely different operation.
- How do you write the reciprocal of as a single power?
Keep the base 8 and negate the index: the reciprocal of is . Do not write (swapped base and index) or (sign change, not reciprocal).
- Given , why is equal to and not ?
Because (negative index means one over), and substituting gives . Writing would mean the negative index is a sign change on , which is not what says.
Related misconceptions
- Index laws operate on the index, not the baseApplying an index law by multiplying or changing the base instead of operating on the indices, a companion index-laws misconception on the same Higher topic.
- Average speed is not the mean of the speedsAveraging the two speeds for a multi-stage journey when the correct method is total distance divided by total time, a different Higher topic with the same trap structure of a plausible wrong operation.