GCSE Maths Higher · AQA · Completing the square and turning points
Completing the square: forgetting to subtract the adjustment constant
When students complete the square on , the instinct is to write the bracket correctly as and then copy the original constant unchanged, giving . That answer is wrong. The bracket expands to , which is 16 more than . That hidden +16 must be subtracted, so the correct constant is and the answer is .
The rule is: constant in the answer = original constant , where is half the coefficient of . Missing this step is one of the most reliable grade 7 to 9 mark-losers on AQA Higher papers.
Already know this is your gap? Skip the diagnostic and jump straight into the targeted lesson.
How to spot it in your own work
- You wrote for , keeping the original constant instead of subtracting to get .
- You wrote for instead of , failing to subtract from .
- You wrote for instead of , keeping when you should subtract .
- For a leading coefficient other than 1, you forgot to scale the adjustment: writing for instead of , because not .
An exam question that triggers it
Here is the structure of a typical AQA Higher completing-the-square question:
Write in the form .
State the values of and .
The misconception writes (keeps the original constant). The fix: expands to , so subtract 16 and carry : , giving .
Why students fall for this
The bracket step is the visible, satisfying part of completing the square. Students write , feel they are done, and copy the original constant unchanged. The hidden arithmetic is out of view at the moment the constant is written down.
A second error pattern appears when the original constant is positive. Students complete the square correctly for negative constants (where the magnitude grows from to ) but hesitate when the constant should reduce: for , the constant goes from to , which feels counterintuitive. They may write (wrong subtraction order) or keep .
For quadratics with a leading coefficient other than 1, both errors compound: students who correctly factor out the coefficient often forget to scale the adjustment by that coefficient when distributing back.
The fix: Always subtract a² from the original constant: constant in answer = original constant − a²
Step 1: find a. Halve the coefficient of . For , the coefficient of is 8, so .
Step 2: write the bracket. .
Step 3: compute the adjustment. . The constant in the answer is .
Step 4: write the answer. .
Step 5: verify by expanding. Expand . If the expansion does not match the original, there is an arithmetic error in step 3.
Worked example
Write in the form .
- Find a. Half of 8 is 4, so , bracket .
- Compute adjustment. . Constant .
- Answer. Trap: expands to , wrong.
- Verify. ✓
Write in the form .
- Factor out 2 from the x terms. .
- Complete the square inside. (a=3, a²=9).
- Substitute and distribute. Trap: forgetting to scale gives , wrong.
- Verify. ✓
Show that is always positive.
- Complete the square. (a=3, a²=9, constant = 13−9 = 4).
- Prove positivity. for all real , so The minimum value is 4, achieved when .
Find out if this is costing you marks
The 10-minute diagnostic checks for this pattern (and four others) using AQA-style GCSE Higher items. Free, no signup, anonymous.
Common questions
- Why is the answer and not for ?
Because , which is 16 more than . To keep the expression equal to you must subtract that extra 16. The constant becomes . Keeping unchanged gives , which is a different expression.
- How does the rule change when the constant in is positive?
The rule is the same: subtract from the original constant. Here and , so the constant becomes and the answer is . The positive constant reduces (from 13 to 4) rather than becoming more negative, but the same subtraction rule applies.
- How do you complete the square when the coefficient of is not 1?
Factor out the leading coefficient from the and terms first. For , write , then complete the square inside: . Distribute the 2 back: . The adjustment must be scaled by the leading coefficient 2 to give 18, not left as 9.
Related misconceptions
- Turning point x-coordinate: the sign flips from vertex formCopying the printed sign from (x−7)²+8 to get x=−7 instead of solving (x−7)=0 to get x=7, a companion completing-the-square misconception on the same Higher topic.
- Negative indices mean reciprocals, not negative numbersReading the minus in 8^-5 as a sign on the result and writing −8^5, when the correct value is 1/8^5, a different Higher topic with the same trap structure of misreading a sign.