GCSE Maths Higher · AQA · Proportion
Constant of proportionality and graph shape: k = x times y in inverse proportion
The most common error when finding in : students apply the direct-proportion formula instead of the correct inverse formula . From point , the trap gives and then inflates to 42 at . The correct gives .
A second error is sketching the graph of as a straight line. It is a reciprocal curve that falls steeply near the -axis and flattens as grows, never touching either axis.
Already know this is your gap? Skip the diagnostic and jump straight into the targeted lesson.
How to spot it in your own work
- You wrote for the point on , giving at instead of 10.5 (JUN24 Paper 2 Q24a).
- You sketched the graph of as a straight line rather than a reciprocal curve that never touches either axis (NOV24 Paper 3 Q10).
- You failed the multiplicative verification test for : checking constant differences instead of constant products (JUN23 Paper 3 Q20a).
- You read in as “the number of desserts” rather than the fixed total (JUN24 Paper 2 Q3a).
An exam question that triggers it
Here is JUN24 Paper 2 Question 24a, reproduced in structure:
is inversely proportional to .
The point lies on the curve .
Find the value of when .
The trap: (direct formula), giving . The fix: , so . Product check: .
Why students fall for this
The default model for a proportionality constant is the ratio: in , . That reflex carries over to without adjustment. But rearranging by multiplying both sides by gives — the product, not the ratio.
The graph error follows from the same overextension: students expect all proportion graphs to be straight lines. For that is correct. For , the curve shoots to infinity as and decays to zero as — the opposite of a line.
A third version arises with tables: students apply an additive test (constant differences) when the structure demands a multiplicative test (constant products). Verifying at each row is faster and more reliable than computing for every entry.
The fix: Multiply x and y to find k; use the product test to verify
Step 1: rearrange to find the formula for . Start from . Multiply both sides by : . This is the inverse formula. The direct formula only applies to .
Step 2: compute k from the given point. Multiply the -value by the -value. For : .
Step 3: find y at the new x. Divide by the new . At : .
Step 4: product check. Multiply the new by your answer and confirm it equals . . If it does not equal , recheck.
Worked example
JUN24·2·24a: , point .
- Find k.
- Find y at x = 12.
- Product check.
- Trap: (direct formula), so . Product check fails: .
NOV24·3·10: , sketch speed against time.
- At : .
- At : .
- At : .
- The curve falls steeply near the -axis and flattens as grows. It never touches either axis. Trap: a straight line with negative gradient.
JUN23·3·20a: . Verify with product test.
- At , : .
- At , : .
- Product is fixed at 36 at every row. Relationship confirmed.
Find out if this is costing you marks
The 10-minute diagnostic checks for this pattern (and four others) using AQA-style GCSE Higher items. Free, no signup, anonymous.
Common questions
- . The point lies on the curve. Find .
. Rearrange to get . The trap applies the direct-proportion formula , which only works for . Product check: , and at : , verified by .
- What does the graph of look like for positive and positive ?
A reciprocal curve that falls steeply near the -axis and flattens as increases. It never touches either axis: as , ; as , but never reaches it. The trap is a straight line with negative gradient, which would mean , an entirely different relationship.
- How do you verify that from a table of values?
Compute at each row and confirm it equals 36. For example, if the table shows : product . If : product . The trap is checking constant differences, which tests linearity, not inverse proportion.
Related misconceptions
- Inverse proportion treated as directWriting y = kx (or scaling y up as x rises) for a y proportional to 1/x relationship. The product xy is fixed, not the ratio.
- Proportion to a power scales linearlyFor y proportional to x squared, doubling x multiplies y by 4, not 2. The scale factor carries the power.